bug-bounty-review

Evaluates bug-bounty reports and drafts responses with severity assessment.

1|Updated Jun 8, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles --skill bug-bounty-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bug-bounty-review
Source: https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles/tree/main/config/claude/skills/bug-bounty-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ryosukesuto/dotfiles --skill bug-bounty-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the evaluation of Bug Bounty reports and assists in crafting professional responses, significantly speeding up the triage process.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Report Analysis: Assesses technical validity, threat level, and recommended actions for bug bounty submissions.
  • Response Generation: Creates draft responses in English based on the assessment, categorizing findings (e.g., Not Applicable, To Fix).
  • Codex Integration: Leverages Codex for a second opinion on vulnerability assessments and review of drafted responses.
  • Use Case: A security researcher submits a report. This Skill analyzes it, determines if it's a valid vulnerability, suggests a remediation path, and drafts an initial response to the researcher, potentially using Codex to refine the technical explanation.

Quick Start

Use the bug-bounty-review skill to evaluate the attached report 'report-CVE-2023-1234.pdf'.

Frequently Asked Questions about bug-bounty-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate bug bounty report triage and threat assessment?

Automating bug bounty report triage involves evaluating technical validity, determining threat levels, and generating recommended remediation actions. This Skill assesses submitted vulnerability findings and drafts initial responses to streamline the security review process.

Can I generate draft responses for security vulnerability reports automatically?

Generating draft responses for security vulnerabilities automates the creation of professional replies based on assessment outcomes. It categorizes findings like Not Applicable or To Fix and drafts initial English responses to communicate with the security researcher.

Does Codex integration help refine vulnerability assessment and response generation?

Codex integration provides a second opinion during vulnerability assessment and reviews drafted responses. Leveraging Codex allows for collaborative review and technical refinement of the security report analysis and the generated remediation explanations.

What is the best way to evaluate technical validity in a security report?

Evaluating technical validity in a security report requires analyzing the submission to determine if it represents a genuine vulnerability. The process assesses the threat level and suggests a remediation path to address the identified security finding.

How do I categorize bug bounty findings like Not Applicable or To Fix?

Categorizing bug bounty findings like Not Applicable or To Fix occurs during the automated report analysis phase. The evaluation determines the validity of the vulnerability and assigns a category to drive the appropriate draft response generation.

Are there limitations to automating bug bounty response generation for complex vulnerabilities?

Automating bug bounty response generation handles draft creation and technical validity assessment, but complex vulnerabilities may require manual review. The generated draft responses and Codex second opinions serve as starting points for finalizing remediation actions.