bugfix-workflow

A structured bugfix workflow records Current Behavior, Expected Behavior, and Unchanged Behavior before advancing to root-cause analysis and regression testing. It is needed for complex defects carrying high regression risk or when formal fix documentation is required.

To prevent regression, define the defect using a three-part behavior model covering current, expected, and unchanged states. Then capture root-cause analysis, fix design, and regression testing details within structured markdown artifacts like bugfix.md, design.md, and tasks.md.

Create traceable bugfix documentation by filling structured templates including bugfix.md, design.md, and tasks.md. These artifacts ensure repeatable QA by linking current behavior definitions directly to root-cause analysis, fix design, and implementation tasks.

Managing root-cause analysis for high-risk defects requires enforcing a step-by-step workflow that separates behavior definition from fix design. This ensures transparency and traceability by decomposing tasks and mandating evidence artifacts before implementation proceeds.

Yes, markdown templates like bugfix.md, design.md, and tasks.md are required to start. They capture core behavior definitions, fix designs, and regression prevention details, ensuring the formal bugfix process remains repeatable and traceable.

Avoid using a formal bugfix workflow for simple, low-risk defects requiring minimal formal documentation or carrying negligible regression risk. The structured process is designed specifically for complex defects where traceability and repeatable QA are necessary.