What problem does it solve? Court bundles get rejected on formatting grounds, costing hearing dates and credibility. The checks required are mechanical and repetitive, yet easy to miss under deadline pressure — especially hidden failures like redactions that only exist as black boxes over a searchable text layer. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Mechanical compliance checks: Verifies continuous pagination matching the index, chronological ordering within sections, legibility, orientation, duplicate removal, and court page/file-size limits. - Privilege and redaction review: Confirms privileged material is removed and that redactions are applied to every copy including the searchable text layer, not just drawn over the visible page. - Structured discrepancy report: Produces a report of missing documents referenced in the index, unindexed documents present, pagination breaks, and illegible pages — each with page numbers. - Use Case: Before filing, run the assembled bundle through the checklist to catch an index that references a document never included, or a redaction that fails copy-paste, before the court does. ## Quick Start Check this assembled hearing bundle against the court's requirements and report any pagination, indexing, or redaction problems with page numbers.
