business-review

Automate Relaticle v3 business-review workflows with stage 0–6 orchestration and browser-truth verification.

1.5k|170|Updated Sep 25, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/relaticle/relaticle --skill business-review-relaticle
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: business-review
Source: https://github.com/relaticle/relaticle/tree/main/.claude/skills/business-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/relaticle/relaticle --skill business-review-relaticle

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The Skill enables a structured, browser-grounded review of code changes in Relaticle by coordinating a multi-persona fleet, discovering live environment details, and producing verifiable verdicts that hinge on real UI observations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Environment discovery and preflight gating before planning tests against a running Relaticle instance.
  • Journey synthesis from the diff and CRM priors, covering happy and sad paths.
  • Adversarial verification, regression ledger management, and optional fix-mode workflows.
  • Automated planning, execution, and publish-ready reporting for PRs or local diffs.

Quick Start

Run a review workflow against a diff to boot Stage 0 discovery, plan, run, verify, and report.

Frequently Asked Questions about business-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate browser-testing and UI review for code changes?

Automate browser-testing for code changes by orchestrating a multi-persona fleet that discovers environment details, synthesizes happy and sad path journeys from the diff, and executes tests against the live app to produce a verifiable verdict.

What is regression ledger management in diff-review workflows?

Regression ledger management in diff-review workflows tracks adversarial verification results and blockers across stages, enforcing safety gates and anti-tampering rules to prevent false positives and ensure reproducible browser-truth verification outcomes.

Can I run QA regression workflows against a local diff or only for PRs?

You can run QA regression workflows against both local diffs and pull requests, executing environment discovery, tier planning, and browser-truth verification to generate publish-ready reporting with explicit review artifacts.

Does browser-truth verification require a running instance before planning tests?

Browser-truth verification requires a running instance for preflight gating, performing environment discovery before planning tests to ensure the multi-persona fleet executes journeys against actual live UI observations rather than assumptions.

What's the best way to prevent false positives in automated UI regression testing?

Prevent false positives in automated UI regression testing by enforcing explicit review artifacts, anti-tampering rules, and safety gates throughout stage 0–6 workflows, ensuring all verdicts hinge on real browser-truth observations from the live app.

When should I not use a panel-of-QAs approach for change verification?

Avoid using a panel-of-Qas approach for change verification when the environment cannot provide a live running instance for browser-truth verification, as the workflow depends on real UI observations and preflight gating to produce reproducible results.