by-screening

Apply hard filters and composite ranking to protein designs, outputting PASS/MARGINAL/FAIL verdicts as CSV.

104|10|Updated Mar 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/001TMF/blatant-why --skill by-screening
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: by-screening
Source: https://github.com/001TMF/blatant-why/tree/main/templates/.claude/skills/by-screening
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/001TMF/blatant-why --skill by-screening

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

BY Screening provides a structured, automated evaluation of design sequences and scores to determine PASS/FAIL/MARGINAL verdicts, ensuring reliable triage before lab submission.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Hard-filter based screening with per-modality thresholds
  • Soft ranking and composite scoring (ipSAE, ipTM, liability) for prioritization
  • Diversity clustering to avoid near-identical top candidates

Quick Start

Run the screening workflow on your designs CSV using the production profile to produce a screened.csv.

Frequently Asked Questions about by-screening

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate protein design screening with hard filters for pLDDT and ipTM scores?

Protein design screening applies hard filters, liability counts, and composite ranking to per-design scores like pLDDT and ipTM, generating PASS/MARGINAL/FAIL verdicts and a structured CSV report.

What is the best way to triage antibody and nanobody designs before lab submission?

Triage antibody and nanobody designs by applying modality-specific batch-level thresholds and soft ranking to produce reliable PASS/FAIL/MARGINAL verdicts prior to lab submission.

Can I run batch screening on de novo binder workflows with liability counts?

Batch screening for de novo binder workflows accepts batch inputs of designs with scores, applying hard filters and liability counts to output a structured CSV plus a screening report.

Does automated design triage support composite scoring based on ipSAE and liabilities?

Automated design triage supports composite scoring by combining ipSAE, ipTM, and liability metrics to generate a calculated ranking for prioritizing top protein design candidates.

Why does protein design screening output MARGINAL verdicts instead of strictly PASS or FAIL?

Protein design screening outputs MARGINAL verdicts for candidates that meet soft ranking criteria but fall near hard filter boundaries, ensuring nuanced triage before lab submission.