C++ Idioms and Patterns

Enforce modern C++ idioms for ownership, error handling, and interface design.

150|48|Updated Jan 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/irahardianto/awesome-agv --skill c-idioms-and-patterns
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: C++ Idioms and Patterns
Source: https://github.com/irahardianto/awesome-agv/tree/main/.agents/skills/cpp-idioms
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/irahardianto/awesome-agv --skill c-idioms-and-patterns

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you avoid unsafe, non-idiomatic C++ patterns and instead produce maintainable, deterministic code that leverages modern C++ features for reliability and performance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Modern ownership and lifetime management: Apply RAII, choose std::unique_ptr vs std::shared_ptr correctly, and prefer Rule of Zero/Rule of Five where appropriate.
  • Predictable error handling: Use std::expected (C++23) or result-style types for expected failures, reserving exceptions for exceptional conditions.
  • Efficient interfaces and types: Prefer std::string_view, std::optional, and std::variant for clear intent; use Concepts and Ranges for expressive, type-safe designs.
  • Practical use case: When implementing a C++ service layer that fetches entities, handles “not found” and validation failures, and exposes clean APIs to callers, use these idioms to design correct ownership, robust errors, and allocation-free read-only parameters.

Quick Start

Ask your AI coding agent to refactor your C++ codebase to follow modern C++ idioms by applying RAII, improving ownership with smart pointers, using std::expected-style result handling, and updating interfaces to use std::string_view, std::optional, and std::variant where they fit best.

Frequently Asked Questions about C++ Idioms and Patterns

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I handle expected failures in C++ without using exceptions?

To handle expected failures in C++ without exceptions, use `std::expected` (C++23) or result-style types. This approach reserves exceptions for truly exceptional conditions, making error handling predictable and producing maintainable service layer code.

When should I use std::unique_ptr vs std::shared_ptr for memory ownership?

Choose `std::unique_ptr` vs `std::shared_ptr` based on strict ownership requirements: apply RAII principles and the Rule of Zero to manage object lifetime deterministically, selecting unique_ptr for exclusive ownership and shared_ptr only when shared ownership is necessary.

How do I make C++ interfaces more efficient with std::string_view?

Use `std::string_view` to create allocation-free read-only parameters in C++ interfaces. Combined with `std::optional` and `std::variant`, it clarifies intent and improves type safety across service and library code without unnecessary memory allocations.

What is the best way to refactor legacy C++ code to modern C++ standards?

The best way to refactor legacy C++ code to modern standards involves enforcing RAII-based patterns, updating ownership with smart pointers, adopting `std::expected`-style result handling, and applying Concepts and Ranges for expressive, type-safe designs across C++17/20/23 codebases.

Does this approach to modern C++ idioms work for both service and library code?

Yes, applying modern C++ idioms works effectively across both service and library code. Enforcing safe resource management, predictable error handling, and correct interface design ensures deterministic execution and maintainable abstractions in any C++17/20/23 development context.

Why should I use std::optional and std::variant in my C++ APIs?

Use `std::optional` and `std::variant` in C++ APIs to express clear intent for optional values and type-safe alternatives. These modern C++ standard library features eliminate ambiguous pointer states and enable robust, type-safe abstractions in your interface design.