carl-dev-flow-requirements

Coordinate structured requirements workflows across draft, revised draft, and final stages.

1|Updated Mar 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/C-ra-ZY/carl-dev-flow-skills --skill carl-dev-flow-requirements
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: carl-dev-flow-requirements
Source: https://github.com/C-ra-ZY/carl-dev-flow-skills/tree/main/skills/carl-dev-flow-requirements
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/C-ra-ZY/carl-dev-flow-skills --skill carl-dev-flow-requirements

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

A structured, auditable process for shaping business intent, defining acceptance criteria, and guiding the lifecycle of requirements artifacts across the Sisyphus and Hephaestus workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured pre-draft interrogation to surface unknowns before drafting.
  • Clear roles and a staged lifecycle: draft → revised draft → final.
  • Artifact-location guidance and promotion rules to ensure traceability of decisions.

Quick Start

Load carl-dev-flow-requirements and begin structured interrogation to produce a draft.

Frequently Asked Questions about carl-dev-flow-requirements

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate structured requirements development across multiple software delivery stages?

Structured requirements development is coordinated through a staged lifecycle from draft to revised draft to final, involving user, Sisyphus, and Hephaestus roles with explicit artifact handling and review rules to ensure traceability.

What is the pre-draft interrogation procedure for requirements artifacts?

The pre-draft interrogation procedure is a structured questioning process that surfaces unknowns and shapes business intent before producing a requirements draft, ensuring acceptance criteria are fully defined prior to artifact creation.

How do I ensure traceability and auditability for requirements artifacts in a multi-stage workflow?

Traceability for requirements artifacts is ensured through artifact-location guidance and promotion rules that govern the transition from draft to final, applying an explicit output contract to guardrail decisions.

Can I use this workflow to define acceptance criteria for stakeholders without prior artifact management setup?

No prior artifact management setup is required to begin defining acceptance criteria for stakeholders; loading the Skill initiates the structured interrogation to produce the initial draft directly.

What's the best way to manage the transition from a revised draft to a final requirements artifact?

The best way to manage the transition to a final requirements artifact is through explicit artifact-location guidance and promotion rules, applying the staged review roles to validate the revised draft before finalization.

Why does the requirements development workflow need explicit output contracts and guardrails?

Explicit output contracts and guardrails are needed in requirements development to enforce structured artifact handling, prevent unreviewed changes, and maintain decision traceability across the Sisyphus and Hephaestus workflow stages.