case-retrospective

Name: case-retrospective
Availability: InStock
Author: sxd007

Reviews completed investigation cases across seven dimensions including hypothesis quality and evidence strategy.

2|Updated Jun 26, 2026

Search Tags:#investigation #audit #retrospective #reasoning #evidence #process improvement

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/sxd007/investigation-ontology --skill case-retrospective

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: case-retrospective
Source: https://github.com/sxd007/investigation-ontology/tree/main/skills/case-retrospective
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sxd007/investigation-ontology --skill case-retrospective

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the lack of systematic learning in investigation workflows by providing a dedicated framework to analyze the process, logic, and collaboration effectiveness of completed cases, rather than just the final outcome.

Core Features & Use Cases

Multi-Dimensional Review: Evaluates investigations across seven critical dimensions including hypothesis quality, evidence strategy, and AI collaboration.
Cognitive Bias Detection: Actively identifies and flags common pitfalls like hindsight bias, confirmation bias, and outcome bias.
Use Case: After closing a complex fraud investigation, use this skill to generate a comprehensive retrospective report that identifies specific areas for improvement in your evidence collection and reasoning process for future cases.

Quick Start

Initiate a formal retrospective analysis for the currently completed case to identify growth opportunities and process improvements.

Frequently Asked Questions about case-retrospective

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

What is a multi-dimensional case retrospective and how does it improve investigation quality?▼

A multi-dimensional case retrospective systematically reviews completed investigation cases to enhance investigator methodology. It evaluates hypothesis quality, evidence strategy, and workflow execution to identify process improvements rather than just assessing the final outcome.

How do I conduct a post-case investigation review to identify cognitive biases?▼

To conduct a post-case investigation review, analyze the completed case metadata, evidence registries, and process memory. The retrospective framework actively detects common cognitive pitfalls like hindsight bias, confirmation bias, and outcome bias to refine reasoning quality.

Do I need specific case files to perform an internal audit quality control retrospective?▼

Yes, performing an internal audit quality control retrospective requires access to structured case metadata, evidence registries, and process memory. These inputs are necessary to evaluate reasoning quality and workflow execution across the seven critical review dimensions.

When should I use a structured retrospective framework for investigative teams?▼

Use a structured retrospective framework for investigative teams after closing complex cases, such as fraud investigations. It generates a comprehensive report identifying specific areas for professional development and evidence collection improvements for future cases.

What's the best way to evaluate evidence strategy and AI collaboration in completed investigations?▼

The best way to evaluate evidence strategy and AI collaboration is applying a seven-dimension review framework to the completed case. This analyzes hypothesis quality and collaboration effectiveness to generate targeted growth opportunities for investigative teams.