One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SimonMcCallum/six-animals --skill cat-agent
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cat-agent
Source: https://github.com/SimonMcCallum/six-animals/tree/main/.claude/skills/cat-agent
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SimonMcCallum/six-animals --skill cat-agent

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Teams often miss critical risks, accept unrealistic assumptions, and lack a structured devil's advocate, leading to avoidable project failures and wasted resources.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic Risk Identification: Analyze plans for technical, resource, dependency, market, execution, and human risks, prioritizing them by likelihood and impact.
  • Group Discussion Risk Analysis: Spot unaddressed risks and blind spots in ongoing team conversations, flagging when consensus forms too quickly without scrutiny.
  • Informed Choice Enablement: Present risks clearly with mitigation strategies to help teams make autonomous, well-informed decisions.
  • Use Case: When reviewing a new product launch plan, use this skill to flag unaddressed technical scalability risks, timeline dependencies, and resource constraints before the team commits to a launch date.

Quick Start

Use the cat-agent skill to analyze the attached Q4 product roadmap for unaddressed risks and blind spots.

Frequently Asked Questions about cat-agent

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify blind spots in project planning before committing?

To identify blind spots in project planning, analyze plans for technical, resource, and market risks while flagging unrealistic assumptions. This process detects unaddressed timeline dependencies and resource constraints before team commitment.

What is the best way to perform risk analysis on team discussions?

Risk analysis on team discussions involves spotting unaddressed risks when consensus forms too quickly without scrutiny. This critical evaluation flags overly optimistic assumptions and prevents avoidable project failures during group decision-making.

How do I challenge unrealistic assumptions in a product roadmap?

To challenge unrealistic assumptions in a product roadmap, apply structured critical evaluation to flag execution and human risks. Presenting clear mitigation strategies enables autonomous, informed choices regarding timeline dependencies and technical scalability.

Can I use a devil's advocate model for pre-commitment risk assessment?

Yes, you can use a cynic/risk manager archetype from the six-animal model for pre-commitment risk assessment. This approach prioritizes identified technical and execution risks by likelihood and impact to enable informed decision making.

When do I need structured critical evaluation for team collaboration?

You need structured critical evaluation for team collaboration when reviewing new product launch plans or strategies. It is required when group decision-making lacks a devil's advocate and consensus forms without proper risk analysis.