caveman

Minimize token usage in AI responses with adjustable intensity levels.

1|Updated Feb 13, 2018
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/g-lok/gs-dotfiles --skill caveman-g-lok
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: caveman
Source: https://github.com/g-lok/gs-dotfiles/tree/main/install.d/dotfiles/ai_skills/.agents/skills/caveman
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/g-lok/gs-dotfiles --skill caveman-g-lok

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Minimize token usage in AI responses while preserving essential technical accuracy.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Ultra-compact responses that preserve critical details.
  • Adjustable intensity levels (lite, full, ultra, wenyan variants) and a simple switch mechanism.
  • Structured communication pattern: "[thing] [action] [reason]. [next step]." for predictable, concise outputs.
  • Real-world use cases include rapid code reviews, brief design discussions, and dense technical explanations.

Quick Start

Activate caveman mode and respond in terse, technically accurate terms.

Frequently Asked Questions about caveman

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I minimize token usage in AI responses while keeping technical accuracy?

You can minimize token usage while keeping technical accuracy by applying article omission rules and structured communication patterns. This enforces concise, predictable outputs for technical chats and code reviews without losing critical details.

What is the best way to get concise AI responses for rapid code reviews?

The best way to get concise AI responses for rapid code reviews is to enforce a fixed pattern like "[thing] [action] [reason]. [next step]." This structured approach guarantees clarity and brevity while preserving essential technical context.

Can I adjust the intensity of token efficiency modes during a technical chat?

Yes, you can adjust the intensity of token efficiency modes using a simple switch mechanism. Variants include lite, full, ultra, and wenyan, allowing you to control response density and length based on your specific technical discussion needs.

Does applying article omission rules affect the clarity of dense technical explanations?

Applying article omission rules does not affect the clarity of dense technical explanations when paired with a structured pattern. This combination actively reduces length while enforcing predictable, terse outputs that maintain precise technical meaning.