ccg

Cross-validate tasks through Codex and Gemini and synthesize outputs.

Updated Feb 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/cheafi/Trading-bot-CC --skill ccg-cheafi
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ccg
Source: https://github.com/cheafi/Trading-bot-CC/tree/main/.github/skills/ccg
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/cheafi/Trading-bot-CC --skill ccg-cheafi

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It reduces the risk of incorrect or one-sided outputs by routing a task through multiple AI models and reconciling their perspectives into a single result.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tri-model orchestration: runs Codex and Gemini in parallel, then synthesizes outputs into one unified answer.
  • Conflict-aware synthesis: explicitly surfaces disagreements and selects a final direction with rationale.
  • Practical fallbacks: continues with whichever provider is available, and drops to Claude-only synthesis if both are unavailable.

Example use cases include PR/code review that benefits from separate architecture vs. UX scrutiny and cross-validation for tasks where models may disagree on correctness or edge cases.

Quick Start

Give the AI the instruction: Review this change and cross-validate architecture/security with Codex while checking UX/clarity and edge cases with Gemini using ccg.

Frequently Asked Questions about ccg

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I cross-validate AI outputs to reduce hallucinations and bias?

Cross-validation reduces AI hallucinations by routing a single task through multiple models like Codex and Gemini, then synthesizing their outputs to surface disagreements and reconcile them into one unified answer.

What is the best way to run a code review that checks both architecture and UX clarity?

Multi-model code review separates architecture and security scrutiny from UX and edge-case checks by running Codex and Gemini in parallel, synthesizing their distinct perspectives into a single conflict-aware result.

How does multi-model synthesis work when AI providers disagree on correctness?

Multi-model synthesis explicitly detects conflicts when Codex and Gemini disagree on edge cases, then selects a final direction with rationale to reconcile the differing outputs into a unified answer.

Do I need parallel CLI invocations to cross-check answers across multiple models?

Parallel CLI invocations are required to run Codex and Gemini simultaneously for cross-checking answers, though the system applies provider fallback behavior to continue with whichever model is available.

What happens to cross-validation if Codex or Gemini is unavailable?

Provider fallback behavior ensures cross-validation continues with whichever provider is available, dropping to Claude-only synthesis if both Codex and Gemini are completely unavailable.

Can I use multi-model orchestration for architecture and UX deliverables?

Multi-model orchestration applies to architecture and UX deliverables by cross-validating the task across Codex and Gemini, explicitly surfacing disagreements to produce a reconciled final output.