cdd-review-implementation

Validate implemented code changes against cd.md decision documents and update review history.

Updated Jan 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yutaro0915/cdd-workflow --skill cdd-review-implementation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cdd-review-implementation
Source: https://github.com/yutaro0915/cdd-workflow/tree/main/src/templates/skills/cdd-review-implementation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yutaro0915/cdd-workflow --skill cdd-review-implementation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, auditable review process to ensure that implementation work faithfully reflects the decision documentation and approved criteria before moving to DONE.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Decision-aligned Review: Verifies that the implementation matches the Selection and explicitly rejected options.
  • Traceable Validation: Checks commit history, code changes, and documentation against the Context constraints.
  • Governance Use Case: Suitable for CI/CD audit workflows and post-implementation governance.

Quick Start

Generate a formal implementation review for a given decision ID and create the review report, updating the cdd.md accordingly.

Frequently Asked Questions about cdd-review-implementation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify code implementation matches decision documentation?

You can validate implementation changes against the Selection and Rejections sections of a decision document, ensuring full compliance with Context constraints before moving to DONE.

What is decision-aligned code review and how does it work?

Decision-aligned code review is a validation process that checks commit history and code changes against approved criteria, operating across the repository to ensure implementations faithfully reflect documented decisions.

How do I automate post-implementation governance for approved decisions?

Automate post-implementation governance by generating a formal review file for a given decision ID, which updates the document's review history and reports actionable findings suitable for CI/CD audit workflows.

Does this code review process check for rejected implementation options?

Yes, the review process explicitly verifies that the implementation matches the Selection section and checks against explicitly rejected options documented in the decision document.

What is the best way to audit code changes against context constraints?

The best way to audit code changes against context constraints is to perform a traceable validation across the repository, checking commit history and documentation to produce a formal review file with actionable status findings.