ce-code-review

You can automate code review by running ce-code-review headlessly on your checkout to generate artifact-friendly, merge-ready reports with structured findings suitable for direct CI/CD integration. It orchestrates tiered reviewer personas to analyze diffs and aggregate results into a single output.

Structured multi-agent code review spawns tiered reviewer personas—covering correctness, testing, maintainability, and project standards—to analyze diffs. It aggregates their findings into a cohesive report containing severity, autofix_class, owner, and verification flags for actionable downstream fixes.

Yes, this code review workflow generates structured findings with fields like severity, autofix_class, owner, and evidence. It produces a merge-ready report that assigns actionable ownership and highlights residual risks, making it ideal for pull request integration.

The best way to surface edge cases is to use a tiered reviewer persona workflow that analyzes diffs for correctness and testing gaps. It aggregates these insights into a structured report, flagging residual risks and verification requirements for downstream ticketing.

Yes, the multi-agent code review workflow supports interactive per-finding walk-throughs and bulk ticketing via trackers. It outputs structured findings with evidence and ownership flags, allowing you to push gated results directly into your issue tracking system.

You should use a gated findings workflow when you need merge-ready reports with strict verification flags before deployment. It is ideal for CI/CD automation where structured findings must be aggregated, filtered by severity, and routed to specific owners for downstream fixes.