ce-doc-review

Coordinate parallel reviewer agents to surface role-specific document issues.

10|Updated Dec 13, 2016
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vitallium/dotfiles --skill ce-doc-review-vitallium
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ce-doc-review
Source: https://github.com/vitallium/dotfiles/tree/main/dot_agents/skills/ce-doc-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vitallium/dotfiles --skill ce-doc-review-vitallium

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Review requirements or plan documents through multi-persona analysis. Dispatches specialized reviewer agents in parallel, auto-applies plain-language fixes, and routes remaining findings through a four-option interaction (per-finding walk-through, auto-resolve with best judgment, Append-to-Open Questions, Report-only) to guide user decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel persona agents surface role-specific issues across a requirements or plan document.
  • Automatic application of mechanical fixes to improve clarity, consistency, and cross-reference integrity.
  • Flexible routing: per-finding walk-through, bulk auto-resolve, or Append-to-Open Questions for deferred analysis.

Quick Start

Invoke ce-doc-review with a target document path to begin the interactive review.

Frequently Asked Questions about ce-doc-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review requirements documents for issues across different roles?

Reviewing requirements documents for role-specific issues is handled by dispatching parallel persona agents that surface problems and auto-apply plain-language fixes to improve clarity, consistency, and cross-reference integrity.

Can I run a headless document review to avoid interactive prompts?

Yes, you can run a headless document review by passing the optional mode:headless parameter when invoking the Skill with a target document path, which tailors the interaction to avoid interactive prompts.

What is the best way to handle open questions found during a multi-agent document review?

The best way to handle open questions found during a multi-agent document review is to route them using the Append-to-Open Questions option, which defers analysis and logs findings for later resolution instead of forcing immediate decisions.

How do I automatically fix mechanical errors in planning documents?

Automatically fixing mechanical errors in planning documents is achieved through the Skill's parallel reviewer agents, which auto-apply plain-language fixes for clarity, consistency, and cross-reference integrity before routing remaining findings for user decisions.

What options do I have for resolving findings from a risk-analysis document review?

Resolving findings from a risk-analysis document review provides four interaction options: per-finding walk-through, auto-resolve with best judgment, Append-to-Open Questions for deferred analysis, or Report-only.