ce-ideate

Generate grounded improvement ideas and critique them adversarially.

Updated Sep 25, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kwam1na/athena --skill ce-ideate-kwam1na
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ce-ideate
Source: https://github.com/kwam1na/athena/tree/main/.agents/skills/ce-ideate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kwam1na/athena --skill ce-ideate-kwam1na

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

ce-ideate helps teams generate a large set of grounded ideas for a topic and evaluate them through adversarial critique, ensuring suggestions stay rooted in the repo or user context.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Grounded ideation across multiple frames aligned to actual codebase or provided context.
  • Adversarial critique to prune weak ideas and surface strong warrants.
  • Structured survivors with explicit warrants and rationale for easy decision-making.
  • Supports persistence by exporting to docs or Proof as appropriate.

Quick Start

Provide a topic and context, then run ce-ideate to generate and critique grounded ideas, returning a ranked set of survivors.

Frequently Asked Questions about ce-ideate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I brainstorm actionable codebase improvements with grounded context?

Grounded ideation identifies actionable codebase improvements by generating diverse frames aligned to your repository context, then applying adversarial critique to prune weak suggestions and surface strong warrants. The result is a ranked set of structured survivors with explicit rationale.

What is adversarial critique in idea generation and how does it filter suggestions?

Adversarial critique evaluates generated improvement ideas to identify weaknesses and validate their grounding in the provided context. It prunes weak ideas and ensures surviving suggestions have a clear warrant and structured rationale for persistence.

Can I use grounded ideation for domains outside of my repository codebase?

Yes, grounded ideation supports user-provided domains and topics outside the repository. You provide the topic and context, and the process generates multi-frame ideas, critiques them adversarially, and returns structured survivors with explicit warrants.

How do I start generating and critiquing grounded ideas for a specific topic?

Provide a topic and your context or codebase, then run the ideation process to generate multi-frame ideas. The system applies adversarial filtering and returns a ranked set of structured survivors with clear warrants suitable for export to docs.

What is the best way to ensure brainstormed ideas stay rooted in actual codebase context?

Grounded ideation ensures ideas stay rooted by aligning multiple frames to the actual codebase or provided context. Adversarial filtering then prunes ungrounded suggestions, leaving only structured survivors with explicit warrants and rationale.

Does ideation with adversarial filtering work for large repositories or complex domains?

Ideation with adversarial filtering applies to topics within your repository or user-provided domains, generating diverse frames and structured survivors. It requires providing the topic and context to produce grounded, warranted ideas for persistence.