ce:ideate

Generate grounded idea candidates with adversarial critique and survivor lists.

Updated Apr 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yxc023/agent-config-studio --skill ce-ideate-yxc023
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ce:ideate
Source: https://github.com/yxc023/agent-config-studio/tree/main/.opencode/skills/ce-ideate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yxc023/agent-config-studio --skill ce-ideate-yxc023

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Generates and critically evaluates grounded ideas about a topic, helping surface strong options before deep brainstorming and ensuring ideas stay aligned with the grounding.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Grounded ideation that covers a broad set of candidate ideas anchored in the provided grounding.
  • Adversarial critique that assesses relevance, novelty, and practicality with explicit rejection reasons.
  • Structured survivors: returns 5-7 high-quality ideas with rationale, downsides, and effort estimates.
  • Multi-frame coverage: ideas are produced across frames such as pain points, inversion, reframing, leverage, cross-domain analogies, and constraint flipping.

Quick Start

Provide a topic and grounding context and the system will generate a ranked set of ideas and present survivors.

Frequently Asked Questions about ce:ideate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generate grounded ideas that stay aligned with my topic context?

To generate grounded ideas, provide a topic and grounding context. The system produces a broad set of candidate ideas anchored to your input, applies adversarial critique, and surfaces 5-7 high-quality survivors with rationale.

What is adversarial critique in brainstorming and how does it filter ideas?

Adversarial critique evaluates candidate ideas by assessing relevance, novelty, and practicality. It provides explicit rejection reasons for weak concepts, ensuring only the strongest, most practical ideas survive the initial brainstorming phase.

How do I structure ideation across multiple frames like inversion and cross-domain analogies?

Structure ideation by generating candidates across multiple frames such as pain points, inversion, reframing, leverage, cross-domain analogies, and constraint flipping. This multi-frame coverage ensures diverse perspectives before final survivor selection.

What is the best way to evaluate idea practicality and effort estimates before deep brainstorming?

The best way to evaluate practicality is using structured survivors. The system returns 5-7 high-quality ideas complete with rationale, identified downsides, and effort estimates, allowing you to assess feasibility before committing to deep brainstorming.

Do I need to provide grounding context for topic analysis, or can I just input a broad topic?

You need to provide grounding context along with your topic. Grounding anchors the generated idea candidates, ensuring the output remains aligned with your specific constraints and preventing irrelevant concepts during topic analysis.