ce-standards-gap-analyzer

Verify STD decisions are implemented in code and documentation.

78|15|Updated May 1, 2023
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Moffran/calibrated_explanations --skill ce-standards-gap-analyzer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ce-standards-gap-analyzer
Source: https://github.com/Moffran/calibrated_explanations/tree/main/.claude/skills/ce-standards-gap-analyzer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Moffran/calibrated_explanations --skill ce-standards-gap-analyzer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps auditors verify that STD intent and decisions are fully realized in code and documentation, focusing on substantive compliance rather than keyword hunting.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Build a practical checklist from STD decisions (intent, requirements, invariants) and trace them against source code, tests, and docs.
  • Identify and document gaps with evidence, severity scoring, and concrete remediation recommendations.
  • Generate a dated compliance verification entry for each STD sweep and update the standards status appendix accordingly.

Quick Start

Run a full STD compliance sweep on the target repository and produce a dated gap report.

Frequently Asked Questions about ce-standards-gap-analyzer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a compliance gap analysis between standards and repository code?

To perform a compliance gap analysis, extract decisions from your standards, build a checklist, compare it against implementation and documentation, classify gaps, and update the status appendix with date stamping.

What is the best way to verify standard intent is realized in source code?

Verifying standard intent in source code requires a full repository sweep of STD entries to ensure decisions, requirements, and invariants are fully realized in the implementation and documentation, supported by concrete evidence.

How do I generate evidence-based compliance reports for an audit?

Generate evidence-based compliance reports by scanning repository contents against a standards checklist, identifying gaps, scoring severity, and producing dated compliance verification entries with remediation recommendations.

Can I audit all STD-XXX decisions in a repository automatically?

Yes, you can audit all STD-XXX decisions by running a full standards sweep across the target repository, comparing source code and documentation against the extracted intent to identify substantive compliance gaps.

How do I track compliance status and remediation progress over time?

Track compliance status by generating a dated gap report for each sweep and appending a verification entry to the standards status appendix, ensuring remediation progress and historical compliance are recorded.

What is the difference between substantive compliance and keyword hunting during a code review?

Substantive compliance verifies the actual realization of standard decisions and invariants in code and documentation, whereas keyword hunting only checks for superficial matches without validating intent or implementation.