cgs.ba.inscope

To check if a new feature fits your project scope, validate the requirement against established artifacts like constitutions and feature specs. This process assesses alignment across architecture, tech stack, business domain, principles, and feasibility to prevent scope creep.

Requirements alignment analysis is the process of evaluating new user stories against a project's defined boundaries. It analyzes requirements across dimensions like architecture, tech stack, and business domain to produce a structured verdict on whether the effort is in scope or out of scope.

Yes, you need Speckit documentation to validate project scope effectively. This analysis is project-agnostic and relies on available Speckit artifacts, such as implementation plans and feature specs, to accurately assess whether new requirements align with established boundaries.

To analyze a user story against a project constitution, input the requirements text for evaluation. The system compares the story against your project artifacts, returning a clear verdict of in scope, partially in scope, or out of scope, complete with detailed reasoning.

The best way to prevent scope creep when adding requirements is to perform dimension-based scope validation. By evaluating new requests against architecture, tech stack, business domain, and feasibility, teams ensure development effort remains focused on aligned features.

Your new requirement fails tech stack alignment validation because it introduces technologies or dependencies outside your project's established boundaries. The analysis evaluates requests against existing specs, producing an out-of-scope verdict with reasoning when architectural boundaries are crossed.