challenge

Audit biases, identify gaps, and test alternative hypotheses in intelligence analysis.

1|Updated Feb 6, 2026

Search Tags:#gap-analysis #assumption-testing #bias-audit #alternative-hypotheses #analytic-vs-intuitive #intelligence-analysis #HEAD-framework

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/jordangaston/claude-plugins --skill challenge-jordangaston

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: challenge
Source: https://github.com/jordangaston/claude-plugins/tree/main/plugins/head/skills/challenge
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jordangaston/claude-plugins --skill challenge-jordangaston

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured process to stress-test intelligence analyses by identifying gaps, auditing biases, and distinguishing analytic from intuitive judgments after data evaluation.

Core Features & Use Cases

Bias Audit: structured review of cognitive biases and their impact on conclusions
Critical Unknowns: enumerate missing information and implications
Alternative Hypothesis: propose and compare competing explanations with distinguishing evidence
Analytic vs. Intuitive Judgments: separate evidence-based reasoning from gut instincts

Quick Start

Run HEAD Step 5 to identify gaps, test assumptions, and distinguish analytic from intuitive judgments after Step 4.

Frequently Asked Questions about challenge

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I perform a bias audit on intelligence analysis conclusions?▼

A bias audit systematically reviews cognitive biases and their impact on conclusions. You perform it by running HEAD Step 5 to stress-test assumptions, identify critical unknowns, and separate evidence-based reasoning from gut instincts after data evaluation.

What is the best way to identify critical unknowns and gaps in an intelligence report?▼

Identifying critical unknowns requires enumerating missing information and analyzing its implications. The best way is to use a structured gap analysis process that applies after data evaluation to rigorously scrutinize conclusions across different scenarios and contexts.

How do I separate analytic reasoning from intuitive judgments in data analysis?▼

Separating analytic reasoning from intuitive judgments involves distinguishing evidence-based conclusions from gut instincts. You achieve this by applying a structured framework that enforces a clear boundary between rigorous data-driven logic and subjective assessments during intelligence analysis.

How do I test alternative hypotheses against existing intelligence conclusions?▼

Testing alternative hypotheses involves proposing and comparing competing explanations with distinguishing evidence. You execute this by stress-testing your primary conclusions through a structured framework that challenges initial assumptions and explores competing scenarios across various contexts.

When should I use a structured framework for assumption testing in intelligence analysis?▼

You should use a structured assumption testing framework after initial data evaluation is complete. It is necessary when you need to ensure rigorous scrutiny of conclusions, audit for cognitive biases, and validate that critical unknowns do not undermine your final analysis.