Guide users through Socratic questioning to evaluate assumptions.
npx skills add https://github.com/vonchristian/sirib --skill challenge-vonchristian
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: challenge Source: https://github.com/vonchristian/sirib/tree/main/.opencode/skills/challenge Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vonchristian/sirib --skill challenge-vonchristian
This Skill helps users challenge their assumptions through structured questioning, promoting critical thinking and informed decision-making.
Run the challenge skill and present an assumption you want to test, then begin the questioning process.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To challenge assumptions using the Socratic method, engage in a structured conversational process that explores the origin, necessity, and validity of your beliefs. This approach requires evaluating your reasoning through contextual inquiry to ensure informed decision-making.
Assumption testing evaluates the validity of your beliefs through structured questioning. It applies the Socratic method to explore where assumptions originate, whether they are necessary, and if alternative perspectives hold stronger supporting evidence.
Start debunking myths by presenting a specific assumption you want to test. The process initiates a questioning sequence that pressure-tests your belief, requiring you to actively evaluate evidence and reasoning before receiving direct feedback on its strengths and weaknesses.
Yes, you receive direct feedback on the strength of your assumption after engaging in the questioning process. This feedback specifically highlights both the strengths and weaknesses of your belief based on the evidence and reasoning you provide.
The best way to pressure-test an assumption is using a conversational Socratic approach that explores its origin, necessity, validity, and alternatives. This structured method promotes critical thinking by requiring you to evaluate beliefs against evidence before finalizing a decision.
You should avoid using this questioning approach if you cannot engage in a multi-step conversational process. The method requires active participation to evaluate evidence and reasoning, making it unsuitable for quick, automated validation needs.
alpoxdevApply First Principles Thinking to deconstruct problems and rebuild solutions.
89jobrienEnforce evidence-first reasoning with multiple hypotheses and self-correction protocols.
toilahuonggAnalyze arguments, detect fallacies, and evaluate claims using structured reasoning frameworks.
go-go-golemsFacilitate structured technical debates with codebase evidence and docmgr integration.
