check-reporting

Audit manuscripts for guideline-compliant reporting with item-by-item assessments.

243|60|Updated Apr 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill check-reporting
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: check-reporting
Source: https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills/tree/main/skills/check-reporting
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills --skill check-reporting

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manuscript teams need automated, standards-aligned checks to ensure reporting accuracy across major medical guidelines.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated checklist generation against STROBE, STARD, PRISMA, STARD-AI, TRIPOD+AI, and related guidelines.
  • Item-by-item assessment with PRESENT/PARTIAL/MISSING statuses and actionable revision notes.
  • AI-assisted guidance for protocol alignment, registration timing, and data availability considerations.

Quick Start

Ingest a manuscript and receive an item-by-item compliance report ready for submission.

Frequently Asked Questions about check-reporting

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check manuscript compliance with STROBE, STARD, or PRISMA guidelines?

Manuscript compliance checks are automated by auto-detecting applicable reporting guidelines based on manuscript type and providing item-by-item PRESENT, PARTIAL, or MISSING assessments. You can ingest a manuscript to receive a structured compliance report and a machine-readable summary ready for submission.

Can I automatically detect which reporting guideline applies to my manuscript?

Yes, applicable guidelines such as STROBE, STARD, PRISMA, STARD-AI, and TRIPOD+AI are auto-detected based on manuscript type. This eliminates manual selection errors and ensures the correct checklist is generated for your specific study design.

How do I audit a medical manuscript for reporting accuracy before journal submission?

Audit a manuscript for reporting accuracy by ingesting it into the checker to receive actionable revision notes for any missing or partial items. The resulting structured compliance report highlights exactly what needs attention before journal submission.

Does the compliance checker support AI-specific reporting guidelines like STARD-AI and TRIPOD+AI?

Yes, AI-specific reporting guidelines like STARD-AI and TRIPOD+AI are fully supported alongside STROBE, STARD, and PRISMA. The checker provides item-by-item assessments and AI-assisted guidance for protocol alignment and data availability considerations.

What is the best way to ensure my systematic review manuscript meets PRISMA standards?

The best way to ensure PRISMA standards are met is to run an automated item-by-item compliance check that flags missing or partial reporting elements. This generates actionable revision notes and a structured report verifying guideline adherence.

Are there limitations to using automated guideline compliance checks for academic manuscripts?

Automated compliance checks rely on ingesting the full manuscript text to detect applicable guidelines and assess items, so incomplete or improperly formatted inputs may affect accuracy. The tool provides actionable revision notes but final submission readiness still requires human review.