checkpoint-ambiguity-review

To find ambiguous interpretations in checkpoint tests, compare checkpoint_N.md spec files against test_checkpoint_N.py files to identify undefined ordering, tie-breaks, or boundary behaviors and generate actionable fixes.

Checkpoint spec analysis is the process of auditing test_checkpoint_N.py files against checkpoint_N.md specs to resolve undefined requirements. You need it when auditing snapshot eval failures or reviewing test outcomes for interpretive issues.

Audit snapshot eval failures for interpretive issues by comparing the checkpoint_N.md specs with corresponding test_checkpoint_N.py files, mapping each assertion to explicit spec language to generate a structured rationale report with proposed fixes.

Yes, the ambiguity review proposes fixes for undefined test boundaries by mapping each ambiguous test assertion to a specific checkpoint_N.md spec clause and generating clarifications to resolve the interpretive issues.

The best way to resolve test ambiguities in checkpoint_N.md specs is to run a review that compares specs with test_checkpoint_N.py files, flagging undefined behaviors and producing a structured report with rationales and suggested fixes.

The limitation of auditing test_checkpoint_N.py files for ambiguity is that findings are constrained to explicit spec language within checkpoint_N.md; the review cannot resolve ambiguities if the spec itself lacks the necessary defining requirements.