cheminformatics

Audit molecular ML, QSAR, docking, retrosynthesis, and generation claims in chemistry manuscripts.

1|Updated Apr 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Avaivartika/jiaoleaf-ai --skill cheminformatics
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: cheminformatics
Source: https://github.com/Avaivartika/jiaoleaf-ai/tree/main/extension/skills/science/cheminformatics
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Avaivartika/jiaoleaf-ai --skill cheminformatics

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Review and critique chemistry manuscripts that claim advances in molecular ML, QSAR, docking, retrosynthesis, reaction prediction, molecular generation, and related manuscript claims, ensuring rigor and transparency.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review Focus: evaluate molecule split strategies (random, scaffold, temporal, cluster), descriptor/fingerprint/model reporting, and leakage risks.
  • Validation checks: assess docking/screening targets, protonation states, controls, scoring limitations; assess generation claims for validity, uniqueness, diversity, and synthesizability; ensure claims are supported with data and methodology.
  • Output: separate methodological risks from wording risks; provide precise revision suggestions for claims, methods, and limitations.

Quick Start

Review the attached chemistry manuscript and provide precise revisions for molecular ML, docking, and generation claims.

Frequently Asked Questions about cheminformatics

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a chemistry manuscript for molecular ML and docking claims?

Review molecular ML, QSAR, docking, and retrosynthesis claims by evaluating molecule split strategies, descriptor reporting, and leakage risks. Separate methodological risks from wording risks, then provide precise revisions for methods, claims, and limitations.

What methodological checks are needed for QSAR and molecular generation validation?

Assess generation claims for validity, uniqueness, diversity, and synthesizability. Ensure claims are supported with data and methodology by checking descriptor reporting, model validation, and split strategies to detect data leakage and overfitting.

How do I detect data leakage in molecular machine learning manuscript submissions?

Detect data leakage by evaluating molecule split strategies including random, scaffold, temporal, and cluster splits. Review descriptor and fingerprint reporting to ensure methodological soundness and reproducibility in chemistry ML workflows.

Can I critique docking pipeline limitations and protonation states in drug discovery papers?

Assess docking and screening targets by checking protonation states, controls, and scoring limitations. Evaluate docking pipeline claims to ensure supported methodology, detecting overfitting and unsupported assertions in drug discovery workflows.

What are common reproducibility risks in retrosynthesis and reaction prediction manuscripts?

Reproducibility risks in retrosynthesis and reaction prediction include unsupported claims, inadequate data handling, and insufficient validity checks. Audit these methodological issues by applying domain-specific criteria and clear revision guidance.

Does reviewing chemical generation claims require domain-specific evaluation criteria?

Yes, reviewing chemical generation claims requires domain-specific criteria focusing on reproducibility, data handling, and validity checks. Apply rigorous critique to detect leakage, overfitting, and unsupported assertions in molecular ML workflows.