What problem does it solve?
Founders and executives without a Chief AI Officer face four recurring strategic decisions: whether to call an API, fine-tune, or build a model; whether an AI use case triggers EU AI Act or US state regulatory obligations; when self-hosted inference beats API pricing; and which AI role to hire next. This Skill provides structured decision frameworks and deterministic calculators for each.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Model Build-vs-Buy Calculator: Compares API, fine-tune, and build-from-scratch paths with 3-year TCO and breakeven analysis via
model_buildvsbuy_calculator.py.
- AI Risk Classifier: Classifies use cases under EU AI Act tiers (prohibited/high/limited/minimal), US state laws (NYC LL 144, Colorado SB 21-169, Illinois HB 53, California SB 1001), and industry overlays (FDA, ECOA, NAIC) via
ai_risk_classifier.py.
- AI Cost Economics: Computes API-to-self-hosted breakeven points with GPU pricing sensitivity via
ai_cost_economics.py.
- AI Team Org Evolution: Stage-to-role hiring map distinguishing AI engineer, ML engineer, and research scientist across pre-PMF to late-stage.
- Use Case: A Series A startup building an AI hiring-screening feature runs the risk classifier, learns it is high-risk under the EU AI Act and triggers NYC LL 144, then uses the cost economics tool to confirm API usage is cheaper than self-hosting at its current volume.
Quick Start
Ask the advisor to classify your AI use case for regulatory risk and recommend whether to use an API, fine-tune, or self-host given your monthly token volume.