chief-ai-officer-advisor

Advises on AI model build-vs-buy, regulatory risk classification, inference cost economics, and AI team hiring.

25.3k|3.6k|Updated Oct 19, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill chief-ai-officer-advisor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: chief-ai-officer-advisor
Source: https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/chief-ai-officer-advisor/skills/chief-ai-officer-advisor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill chief-ai-officer-advisor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Founders and executives without a Chief AI Officer face four recurring strategic decisions: whether to call an API, fine-tune, or build a model; whether an AI use case triggers EU AI Act or US state regulatory obligations; when self-hosted inference beats API pricing; and which AI role to hire next. This Skill provides structured decision frameworks and deterministic calculators for each.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Model Build-vs-Buy Calculator: Compares API, fine-tune, and build-from-scratch paths with 3-year TCO and breakeven analysis via model_buildvsbuy_calculator.py.
  • AI Risk Classifier: Classifies use cases under EU AI Act tiers (prohibited/high/limited/minimal), US state laws (NYC LL 144, Colorado SB 21-169, Illinois HB 53, California SB 1001), and industry overlays (FDA, ECOA, NAIC) via ai_risk_classifier.py.
  • AI Cost Economics: Computes API-to-self-hosted breakeven points with GPU pricing sensitivity via ai_cost_economics.py.
  • AI Team Org Evolution: Stage-to-role hiring map distinguishing AI engineer, ML engineer, and research scientist across pre-PMF to late-stage.
  • Use Case: A Series A startup building an AI hiring-screening feature runs the risk classifier, learns it is high-risk under the EU AI Act and triggers NYC LL 144, then uses the cost economics tool to confirm API usage is cheaper than self-hosting at its current volume.

Quick Start

Ask the advisor to classify your AI use case for regulatory risk and recommend whether to use an API, fine-tune, or self-host given your monthly token volume.

Frequently Asked Questions about chief-ai-officer-advisor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I decide between API, fine-tuning, or building my own AI model?

Run model_buildvsbuy_calculator.py with your use case profile covering volume, latency, accuracy, and team capacity. It compares 3-year TCO across API tiers, fine-tuning, and self-hosting, then recommends a path with failure modes. Default to API unless you have domain-specific behavior, labeled data, and ML capacity.

How do I classify an AI use case under the EU AI Act?

Run ai_risk_classifier.py with a JSON profile describing the domain, deployment geography, automation level, and decision impact. It returns a tier (prohibited, high, limited, or minimal), required obligations with article citations, and whether conformity assessment is needed.

At what token volume does self-hosted inference beat API pricing?

For 70B-class models on rented GPUs, breakeven against frontier-economy APIs typically falls between 100M and 500M tokens per month depending on utilization and GPU rates. Run ai_cost_economics.py with your workload to compute the exact crossover with low, mid, and high GPU pricing scenarios.

Does this skill cover RAG implementation or prompt engineering?

No. This skill is strategic only and explicitly excludes tactical AI/ML engineering. For RAG implementation, agent design, prompt governance, eval infrastructure, or inference cost optimization, it directs you to the corresponding engineering skills in the repository.

When should a startup hire its first AI engineer versus a research scientist?

Hire an AI engineer first at Series A to own prompts, evals, and deployment. Research scientists are only justified at Series C or later when the model itself is core IP, since earlier hires lack the eval infrastructure and validated use cases to deliver value.

Is the AI risk classifier a substitute for legal advice?

No. The classifier is triage tooling that surfaces risk tiers, triggered laws, and required controls with citations. EU AI Act conformity assessments and binding compliance decisions require qualified AI counsel, and the skill states this limitation explicitly.