china-law-master

Structure Chinese law practice reasoning into evidence-first protocols and decision-ready playbooks.

114|12|Updated May 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/swaylq/master-skill --skill china-law-master-swaylq
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: china-law-master
Source: https://github.com/swaylq/master-skill/tree/main/prototypes/china-law-master/output
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/swaylq/master-skill --skill china-law-master-swaylq

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill converts Chinese law practice questions (commercial, civil, criminal) into structured, evidence-first reasoning and a decision-ready workflow, helping you avoid common real-practice failures like jurisdiction/time-limit mistakes and weak evidence strategy.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Agentic Protocol for real cases: classifies the question type (needs facts vs pure framework vs mixed) and drives mandatory web/tool research across legal status, procedure essentials, substantive law, and enforceability.
  • Four Essentials-first playbook: emphasizes jurisdiction, limitation periods, evidence, and parties before substantive arguments to reduce “procedural loss” risk.
  • Evidence and risk management: prioritizes evidence preservation, likelihood/cost/executability assessment, and client expectation management with explicit non-guarantee boundaries.
  • Workflow coverage: supports end-to-end workflows for civil/commercial filing pre-assessment, contract review, criminal defense (investigation to trial), and cross-border commercial disputes (arbitration/enforcement).

Quick Start

Ask the AI: “I need guidance on a Chinese civil/commercial dispute about contract performance—here are the facts and documents I have; use the Agentic Protocol, check the Four Essentials, and produce a practical next-steps plan including what evidence to obtain and what risks to disclose.”

Frequently Asked Questions about china-law-master

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure Chinese law practice reasoning for commercial disputes?

To review a contract under Chinese law, use a framework that checks the Four Essentials—jurisdiction, limitation periods, evidence, and parties—before substantive arguments, ensuring enforceability and managing client expectations with explicit non-guarantee boundaries.

What is the best way to plan evidence strategy for a civil lawsuit in China?

Yes, criminal defense workflow in China is supported end-to-end from investigation to trial by structuring procedural issue spotting, evidence planning, and mandatory research across substantive law and procedural dimensions.

Does this approach work for cross-border commercial arbitration and enforcement?

Before evaluating substantive arguments in Chinese legal consultation, you must check the Four Essentials: jurisdiction, limitation periods, evidence, and parties, to avoid common real-practice failures like procedural loss.

How do I assess enforceability and cost risks in Chinese legal consultation?

Common real-practice failures in Chinese law include jurisdiction and time-limit mistakes, weak evidence strategy, and ignoring enforceability; these are mitigated by structuring an evidence-first Agentic Protocol that mandates procedural and evidentiary research.