chravel-architecture-audit

To audit feature module integrity, you assess whether features are self-contained and properly organized to detect boundary violations and layering problems. This structural review ensures modules maintain strict separation of concerns across the codebase.

Reviewing data access patterns involves analyzing how Supabase queries and state management are implemented to identify structural technical debt. This process exposes inefficient data retrieval layers and improper state handling within your application.

Evaluating page and component separation requires examining the division of responsibilities between page-level logic and UI components. This architectural audit identifies structural layering problems and ensures clean separation of concerns across the view layer.

Yes, an architecture audit is applicable for planning new feature development by evaluating critical path flows like trip loading, chat, and payments. It helps assess technical health and ensures new features integrate cleanly without increasing structural debt.

You need a type architecture review when checking for consistent and well-defined type definitions across your application's codebase. This audit identifies type inconsistencies that cause integration issues and compound technical debt during feature expansion.