chronicler

To verify file comprehension, provide the file path and your notes. The tool reviews only the specified scope, using your notes as the baseline to generate a concise comprehension report.

A dependency and coupling scan identifies ownership and relationships between concepts within your specified file scope. It reviews the provided boundaries to surface how files interact and depend on each other.

Yes, you can check file understanding without notes. When notes are absent, the comprehension review generates a standalone summary to validate your understanding of the provided material.

You should not use a file comprehension check for implementation, refactoring, or broad code review tasks. It is designed strictly for compact understanding checks, responsibility scans, and risk assessments within a specified scope.

To perform a confusion and risk assessment, provide the bounded file scope. The review will surface ambiguities, potential misconceptions, and risks based strictly on the files you specified.

No, file comprehension review does not work on broad codebases. It operates with strict scoping rules, requiring you to provide a specific file or a user-bounded set of files for the review.