chronology

Build a litigation timeline by extracting dated events from declared document sources like PDFs and emails, de-duplicating repeated entries, and tagging each event by significance. The resulting chronology.md file provides a courtroom-ready timeline with versioned diffs.

A statement of facts timeline is a filtered chronology sequencing dated events from case documents for briefing or witness preparation. You need one when converting a document production into a structured, SoF-ready narrative aligned with your case theory.

De-duplicate chronology events by extracting dated occurrences across all declared sources and merging repeated entries. The process identifies overlapping events across emails, PDFs, and exports, consolidating them into single entries tagged by significance to the matter theory.

Yes, a privilege-screening posture decision is required before extracting dated events. The tool forces a privilege posture gate that flags entries for counsel review when sources may be privileged or uncertain, ensuring protected materials are handled appropriately.

Yes, you can generate witness-specific filtered timelines from an existing legal chronology. By requesting a filtered variant, the tool outputs a timeline tailored to individual witnesses alongside the default working chronology and statement-of-facts formats.

When document coverage is thin or files are inaccessible, the chronology tool records and reports those gaps. Gap reporting identifies missing periods in the timeline, allowing counsel to seek supplementary productions before finalizing the statement of facts.