ci-cd-review

Reviews diffs and pipelines to produce actionable checklists for merge readiness.

Updated Feb 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/brtstore4340-glitch/POS_SUPA --skill ci-cd-review-brtstore4340-glitch
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ci-cd-review
Source: https://github.com/brtstore4340-glitch/POS_SUPA/tree/main/skills/ci-cd-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/brtstore4340-glitch/POS_SUPA --skill ci-cd-review-brtstore4340-glitch

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? This Skill helps developers systematically review code changes and CI/CD pipeline results, turning raw error logs and diffs into a clear, actionable fix plan that ensures merge readiness. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured Review Workflow: Follows a six-step procedure from reproducing errors to delivering a PR-ready summary. - Guardrails & Acceptance Criteria: Enforces minimal diffs, lint/build verification, and security best practices before merging. - Use Case: When a pull request fails CI with lint or build errors, use this Skill to diagnose the root cause, apply a minimal patch, and verify the fix with npm run lint and npm run build. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to review a failing CI pipeline log and produce a fix plan with verification commands.

Frequently Asked Questions about ci-cd-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a failing CI pipeline before merging a pull request?

Collect the full error output, reproduce the failure locally, identify the root cause, and apply a minimal patch. Then verify with npm run lint and npm run build, and summarize findings, risks, and rollback steps before merging.

What is the best workflow for fixing lint and build errors in Node.js projects?

Reproduce the error with the exact command, diagnose the root cause with evidence, apply the smallest possible diff, and re-run npm run lint and npm run build. Finish with a smoke test of key flows to confirm the feature still works.

Can this review process work with tools other than npm and PowerShell?

The primary tooling is PowerShell, Node.js with npm, and Git, with Python as an optional secondary tool. The underlying review procedure of reproduce, diagnose, patch, and verify applies to other stacks, but the acceptance commands are npm-based.

Why should I avoid disabling lint or tests to fix a failing build?

Disabling lint or tests hides the underlying problem rather than fixing it and can let defects reach production. This workflow requires explicit approval before weakening any check and always prefers a minimal, targeted patch.

What are the limitations of a checklist-based code review approach?

A checklist approach depends on accurate input such as complete error logs and correct file paths, so it cannot guess missing context. It also avoids broad refactors, meaning deep architectural issues may need a separate dedicated effort.