citation-audit

To verify citation existence and attribution, you audit bibliography entries against official sources like DBLP and arXiv. This process cross-checks authors, years, and venues to ensure metadata accuracy and proper attribution, returning per-entry verdicts for validation.

Checking if a citation supports a claim requires context verification against the cited work. This audit assesses whether the referenced paper actually substantiates the surrounding text, catching wrong-context usage and author-name issues during pre-submission checks.

Cross-checking bibliographic metadata involves comparing authors, year, venue, and title against canonical sources such as arXiv and DBLP. This ensures accuracy and proper attribution, producing a machine-readable ledger suitable for downstream validation pipelines.

Yes, you can generate a structured citation audit report for submission pipelines. The audit outputs both a human-readable CITATION_AUDIT.md and a machine-readable CITATION_AUDIT.json ledger, enabling seamless integration into peer-review preparation workflows.

Citation-audit is suitable for bibliographic hygiene in large documents and pre-submission checks. It identifies and verifies each citation entry against official sources, applying cross-checks across metadata to ensure accuracy without document scale limitations.