What problem does it solve?
Zero-context verification that every bibliographic entry in a paper is real, correctly attributed, and used in a context the cited paper actually supports. Uses a fresh cross-model reviewer with web/DBLP/arXiv lookup to catch hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, version mismatches, and wrong-context citations (cite present but the cited paper does not establish the claim). Use when user says "审查引用", "check citations", "citation audit", "verify references", or before submission to ensure bibliography integrity.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Verify existence of cited papers across arXiv/DOI/venues.
- Validate metadata: authors, year, venue, title against canonical sources (DBLP, arXiv, ACL Anthology, Nature, OpenReview, etc.).
- Check context: ensure the citation actually supports the claim it's used to support in the manuscript.
- Constants and workflow details: a fresh reviewer thread per audit, web access required, and per-entry verdicts (KEEP / FIX / REPLACE / REMOVE) with a machine-readable JSON log.
Quick Start
Run this skill after your LaTeX draft and bib file are ready to verify each citation against reliable online sources.