ck:code-review

Review code for security issues, spec compliance, and quality.

1|Updated May 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/auxi-wardrobe/auxi-all-in --skill ck-code-review-auxi-wardrobe
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ck:code-review
Source: https://github.com/auxi-wardrobe/auxi-all-in/tree/main/.agents/skills/code-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/auxi-wardrobe/auxi-all-in --skill ck-code-review-auxi-wardrobe

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires gh, git, python, and includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill unit ensures high code quality through comprehensive code review, security analysis, and adherence to rigorous review protocols.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Code Review: Actively seeks to find and address security holes and potential failure modes.
  • Review Protocols: Follows a three-stage review process focusing on spec compliance, code quality, and adversarial review.
  • Integrated Tools: Offers a suite of tools for codebase analysis, task management, and integration with other workflows.

Quick Start

Use the ck:code-review skill to initiate a code review for PR number 123.

Frequently Asked Questions about ck:code-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct an adversarial code review on a GitHub pull request?

Adversarial code review actively seeks to find security holes and potential failure modes in a GitHub pull request. This Skill executes a three-stage protocol focusing on spec compliance, code quality, and red-team analysis to ensure comprehensive security coverage.

What is red-team analysis in software engineering code reviews?

Red-team analysis in code review is an adversarial approach that actively probes for security holes and potential failure modes. It operates on PRs, commits, pending changes, or entire codebases to ensure strict spec compliance and high code quality.

Do I need git and python to run spec compliance checks on commits?

Yes, you need git and python installed to run spec compliance checks. The Skill integrates with git for commit diffs and python for executing its review scripts and references to analyze codebase changes accurately.

Can I review an entire codebase for code quality or just pull request diffs?

You can review an entire codebase for code quality, not just pull request diffs. The Skill operates on PRs via GitHub, commits via Git, pending changes, or the entire codebase to assess spec compliance and perform adversarial review.

What's the best way to automate security analysis and spec compliance for pending changes?

The best way to automate security analysis for pending changes is using a three-stage review protocol. This Skill applies red-team analysis, spec compliance checks, and code quality assessment directly to your pending changes or commits.

Why does my code review fail to catch potential failure modes and security holes?

Standard code reviews often fail to catch security holes because they lack adversarial review protocols. Implementing red-team analysis actively targets potential failure modes and enforces strict spec compliance across the codebase.