ck:code-review

Adversarial code review red-teams pull requests to find security holes, false assumptions, and race conditions. It runs spec compliance, code quality, and adversarial stages, then adjudicates findings with Accept, Reject, or Defer verdicts.

Run a security audit on pending git changes by providing --pending changes, commit hashes, or PR numbers. The review fetches diffs, applies scope gates, and produces actionable reports containing severity, attack vectors, and remediation guidance.

Diff analysis supports full codebase scans to check spec compliance and readiness for merge. It resolves appropriate context, runs multi-stage reviews, and returns evidence-based findings to block risky merges and prioritize fixes.

The best way to review a pull request for race conditions and failure modes is applying an adversarial red-team review. It surfaces critical security issues with specific locations, impacts, and fix guidance, converting medium findings into tracked tasks.

Verify remediation fixes by running a targeted re-review on updated diffs. The adjudication process re-evaluates previous findings, confirms whether security holes and false assumptions are resolved, and outputs integration points for re-verification.