ck-feature-frontier

Framework advancement prioritization follows a strict hierarchy of robustness, performance, and tooling, ensuring all proposed changes are backed by measurement or failing tests. This approach evaluates candidate advancements against existing codebase constraints and maintainer-defined boundaries.

Managing ECS framework development requires an evidence-based portfolio of candidate advancements to prevent stalled branch resurrection. This ensures development efforts focus exclusively on high-impact robustness and performance modifications.

Validating framework modifications requires evaluating candidates against existing codebase constraints, historical decisions, and maintainer-defined boundaries. This evidence-based approach mandates measurement and test-driven validation for all proposed framework changes.

A structured decision-making framework for entity component system development is needed when deciding whether to optimize entity creation or implement debug overlays. It verifies if candidates are already documented, measured, or explicitly ruled out by the maintainer.

Framework prioritization explicitly supports teardown lifecycle hardening, GC audit automation, and snapshot coverage expansion. These curated candidates are evaluated through a strict hierarchy to ensure high-impact robustness and performance improvements.

Framework development requires failing tests or measurements before implementing performance optimizations to facilitate evidence-based development. This strict hierarchy ensures all proposed modifications are validated and prevent undocumented codebase changes.