ck:predict

Simulate a five-expert persona debate to analyze code changes for architectural, security, performance, and UX issues.

Updated Jun 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/duy-tung/claude-code-setup --skill ck-predict-duy-tung
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ck:predict
Source: https://github.com/duy-tung/claude-code-setup/tree/main/claude/skills/ck-predict
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/duy-tung/claude-code-setup --skill ck-predict-duy-tung

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The ck:predict skill identifies potential issues and improves design integrity early in the software development lifecycle by simulating debates among expert personas.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Persona Analysis: Simulates debates among five expert personas (Architect, Security, Performance, UX, Devil's Advocate) to analyze proposed changes.
  • Early Risk Detection: Helps catch architectural, security, performance, and UX issues before they become major problems.
  • Verdict & Recommendations: Provides a verdict of 'GO', 'CAUTION', or 'STOP' along with actionable recommendations for each persona.
  • Integration: Can be chained with other skills for deepening risk scenarios, creating implementation plans, and high-risk feature implementation.

Quick Start

Analyze the impact of the proposed change with the command: /ck:predict "Add WebSocket support for real-time notifications"

Frequently Asked Questions about ck:predict

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I predict code review risks before implementing a new feature?

You can predict code review risks by conducting a multi-persona debate that simulates expert perspectives. This analysis identifies architectural, security, performance, and UX issues early, providing a GO, CAUTION, or STOP verdict along with actionable recommendations.

What is persona debate based predictive analysis for software engineering?

Persona debate analysis assesses code changes by simulating discussions among five expert roles like Architect and Security. This mechanism evaluates design integrity from multiple angles, helping catch potential issues early in the software development lifecycle.

How do I assess architectural and security risks for proposed code changes?

Assess risks for proposed code changes by running a predictive analysis that simulates a debate among five expert personas. The analysis checks specifically for architectural, security, performance, and UX issues, delivering a final verdict and actionable recommendations.

Can I use predictive analysis for high-risk feature implementation planning?

Predictive analysis supports high-risk feature implementation by providing a CAUTION or STOP verdict to guide decisions. The skill can be chained with other tools to deepen risk scenarios and create detailed implementation plans for complex changes.

When do I need design integrity checks for software development?

You need design integrity checks early in the software development lifecycle before code changes become major problems. Running a multi-persona debate helps identify architectural and performance issues proactively, ensuring robust implementation prior to development.