claim-chart

Map patent claims or civil causes of action to pin-cited evidence and identify gaps.

109|20|Updated Mar 7, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/stakwork/stakgraph --skill claim-chart-stakwork
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: claim-chart
Source: https://github.com/stakwork/stakgraph/tree/main/mcp/skills/litigation-legal/claim-chart
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stakwork/stakgraph --skill claim-chart-stakwork

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill turns patent claims or civil causes of action into structured, element-by-element charts that expose unsupported mappings, missing evidence, disputed constructions, and litigation risks.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Patent Claim Charting: Parse independent and dependent claims, evaluate infringement or invalidity theories, identify construction-dependent terms, and map each limitation to pin-cited evidence.
  • Civil Element Analysis: Map causes of action and affirmative defenses against pleadings, testimony, produced documents, and other evidence while identifying gaps and discovery priorities.
  • Review and Work-Product Generation: Audit existing charts, assess mapping strength, produce gap or needs-evidence lists, and generate markdown, CSV, and spreadsheet-ready outputs with attorney-focused guardrails.
  • Use Case: For an accused product or breach-of-contract matter, use this Skill to organize every claim element, cite the supporting and contradicting evidence, and prioritize what must be verified or collected before motion practice or trial.

Quick Start

Use the claim-chart skill to map the asserted patent claims or pleaded civil elements against the supplied evidence and return a pin-cited chart with prioritized gaps.

Frequently Asked Questions about claim-chart

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build a claim chart that maps patent infringement elements to evidence?

A claim chart maps patent limitations or civil causes of action against evidence element-by-element. It applies to patent infringement, invalidity, and claim-construction review by identifying unsupported mappings, missing evidence, and disputed constructions to highlight litigation risks.

Can I use a claim chart for civil litigation causes of action and affirmative defenses?

Yes, claim charting applies to civil claims and affirmative defenses by mapping pleaded elements against testimony, produced documents, and other evidence. It identifies evidence gaps and discovery priorities for summary-judgment preparation and trial readiness.

What do I need to prepare before generating an element-by-element claim chart?

You need controlling jurisdictional authorities, pleaded claims or asserted patent claims, target materials, and pin-cited source evidence. You must also explicitly handle construction disputes, dependent claims, defenses, and evidence limitations before generating the chart.

How does claim charting identify evidence gaps for discovery planning?

Claim charting identifies evidence gaps by mapping each limitation or civil element against pin-cited source materials and flagging unsupported mappings. It produces a prioritized gap or needs-evidence list to guide discovery planning and pre-motion verification.

What is the best way to review an existing claim chart for unsupported mappings?

Audit existing claim charts by assessing mapping strength, checking supporting and contradicting evidence, and generating gap or needs-evidence lists. The review produces markdown, CSV, and spreadsheet-ready outputs with attorney-focused guardrails for motion practice.