What problem does it solve? Litigators need element-by-element mappings of patent claims or civil causes of action against evidence, with every cell pin-cited and every evidentiary gap surfaced before a filing, MSJ, or trial. Manually building these charts is slow and prone to under-flagging missing proof. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Patent claim charts: Parse asserted claims into elements, flag construction disputes and means-plus-function terms, and map against accused products (infringement), prior art (invalidity), or an opposing party's chart (review), including dependent-claim rows and DOE candidacy rows. - Civil element charts: Map elements of a cause of action or affirmative defense against deposition testimony, declarations, and produced documents, with jurisdiction-specific formulations for Delaware, New York, and California surfaced proactively. - Gap detection: Produce a gap list (civil) or needs-evidence list (patent) as the priority output, framed by case phase from pre-filing plausibility through trial order of proof. - Use Case: A litigator asks "what are we missing to prove breach of contract" and receives an element chart with pin-cited evidence per element, strength ratings, and a discovery-priority gap list written to the matter's claim-charts folder. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to build a claim chart for your asserted patent claims or a civil element chart for your pleaded cause of action, specifying the side, jurisdiction, and case phase.
