claims-drafting

Drafts jurisdiction-specific patent claims from invention disclosures with examiner-style review.

Updated Jul 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL --skill claims-drafting-lingjie-wang
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: claims-drafting
Source: https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL/tree/main/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/skills/claims-drafting
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Lingjie-wang/autoRL --skill claims-drafting-lingjie-wang

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Drafting patent claims is the most legally consequential step of a patent application, yet it requires precise jurisdiction-specific formatting, antecedent basis discipline, and prior art avoidance that is difficult to get right manually. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Jurisdiction Claim Drafting: Generates independent and dependent claims in CN (其特征在于), US (comprising), and EP (characterised in that) formats, including utility model apparatus-only claims. - Cross-Model Examiner Review: Submits drafted claims to an external reviewer model simulating a USPTO/CNIPA/EPO examiner, then iterates up to three revision rounds based on feedback. - Claim-to-Specification Mapping: Verifies every claim element has specification support and produces a claims summary table with prior art avoidance rationale. - Use Case: Given an invention disclosure, prior art report, and novelty assessment, produce a complete CLAIMS.md with intermixed independent/dependent numbering and an examiner review summary. ## Quick Start Draft patent claims for the invention described in patent/INVENTION_DISCLOSURE.md using the prior art report and novelty assessment in the patent directory.

Frequently Asked Questions about claims-drafting

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I draft patent claims from an invention disclosure?

Provide a structured invention disclosure with core and supporting features, plus prior art and novelty reports. The skill drafts broad independent method and system claims first, then 5-10 dependent claims per independent claim as fallback positions.

What is the difference between CN, US, and EP patent claim formats?

CN claims use a two-part form with 其特征在于 separating known from inventive features. US claims typically use open transitions like comprising. EP mandates a two-part form with characterised in that. The skill can draft all three sets for the same invention.

Can patent claims be drafted for a utility model (实用新型)?

Yes, but utility models are CN jurisdiction only and permit apparatus or device claims exclusively—no method or product-by-process claims. A single independent apparatus claim is sufficient, formatted as 一种[主题],其特征在于,包括:[组件描述].

How are patent claims reviewed for patentability before filing?

The skill sends drafted claims to an external reviewer model acting as a USPTO, CNIPA, or EPO examiner. It checks clarity, written description support, anticipation, obviousness, and antecedent basis, then revises claims over up to three rounds.

Why must patent claims avoid result-to-be-achieved language?

Claims must recite structural features or method steps, not outcomes like signal characteristics or measurement results, because result language creates indefiniteness rejections. The skill enforces this rule and flags functional language during examiner review.