clarify

Identify and rewrite unclear UX copy across onboarding, forms, and error messages.

Updated Mar 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/deadhearth01/SugCreativeSite --skill clarify-deadhearth01
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: clarify
Source: https://github.com/deadhearth01/SugCreativeSite/tree/main/.agents/skills/clarify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/deadhearth01/SugCreativeSite --skill clarify-deadhearth01

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Unclear UX copy, error messages, and microcopy create friction, confusion, and frustration for users. This Skill helps identify, clarify, and rewrite copy to improve understandability and usability across interfaces.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Diagnose unclear language in onboarding, forms, error messages, labels, and help text.
  • Propose precise rewrites that align with user mental models and reduce cognitive load.
  • Provide actionable examples and rationale that teams can implement in product design and content workflows.

Quick Start

Run a clarity audit of the current UI copy and propose concrete rewrite suggestions following the UX-writing guidelines above.

Frequently Asked Questions about clarify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make UX copy clearer and easier to understand in a user interface?

Improving UX copy clarity involves diagnosing unclear language in labels, error messages, and tooltips, then proposing precise rewrites with rationale that align with UX-writing principles to reduce user confusion and cognitive load.

What is the best way to rewrite error messages so users understand what went wrong?

The best way to rewrite error messages is to audit them for confusing language, then propose precise rewrites with practical examples and rationale aligned with UX-writing principles, helping users quickly understand and resolve the issue.

How do I audit microcopy to reduce user friction in forms and onboarding flows?

Auditing microcopy to reduce user friction involves running a clarity workflow that discovers unclear labels and instructions in forms and onboarding flows, then proposes concrete rewrites and practical examples to reduce cognitive load.

Can I use a structured workflow to propose UI copy rewrites with examples and rationale?

Yes, a structured clarity workflow encapsulates discovery, justification, proposed rewrites, and practical examples aligned with UX-writing principles, enabling teams to implement actionable UI copy improvements within design and content workflows.

Does this approach work for help text and tooltips, or just form labels and error states?

This clarity approach works across all product interfaces including help sections, tooltips, onboarding flows, forms, and error states, diagnosing unclear language and proposing precise rewrites wherever users experience confusion.

Why do unclear labels and instructions increase cognitive load for product users?

Unclear labels and instructions increase cognitive load because they fail to match user mental models, creating friction and frustration; a clarity audit identifies these pain points and proposes UX-writing-aligned rewrites to improve understandability and usability.