clarify

To turn vague ideas into precise requirements specifications, you can use an interactive Socratic interview process that asks one targeted question at a time to crystallize ambiguous requirements into a clear, testable spec.

Ambiguity scoring quantifies goals, constraints, and criteria during requirements gathering by evaluating your responses throughout the iterative interview phases, ensuring all vague aspects of your idea are measured and resolved before generating the final specification.

The best way to write a spec for brownfield projects is through a disciplined phase-based process that conducts targeted interviews to identify existing constraints, culminating in a complete written specification document stored under docs/spec with metadata and transcript.

Yes, you can use a one-question-per-round interview to clarify project requirements, as this iterative Socratic approach prevents information overload and allows you to systematically address ambiguity in both greenfield and brownfield scenarios before producing a final spec.

You need a formal specification document when ambiguous requirements threaten to derail your project, requiring a structured interview process to elicit precise goals and constraints that result in a testable spec saved as a markdown file with full metadata and interview transcript.

Yes, the specification generation process fully supports greenfield ideas by applying targeted questioning and ambiguity scoring to new concepts, transforming them from scratch into a crystallized, testable spec document with proper frontmatter and metadata.