classify-loop

To classify autonomous agent loops for governance and risk management, map the agent workflow to specific loop types—code-generation, operational, supervisory, or fully autonomous—to determine required oversight levels and rollback paths.

For a fully autonomous agent deployment, governance controls are determined by classifying the loop type to produce a structured controls checklist, risk profile, and rollback paths required for formal audits and deployment approvals.

To audit an autonomous agent workflow during a governance review, classify the agent's operational loop to generate a loop-stability assessment, rationale, and structured controls checklist for ongoing risk management.

You need to map rollback paths for autonomous agent workflows during new agent design or deployment audits to determine the appropriate level of human oversight and required approvals for each specific loop type.

Yes, agent loop classification works for both code-generation and supervisory loops, mapping each distinct loop type to the appropriate governance controls, risk profiles, and rollback paths for structured governance planning.

The best way to determine required approvals for an autonomous agent loop is to classify the workflow into its specific loop category and use the resulting controls checklist and loop-stability assessment to define the autonomy level.