claude-review

Review Hyperlane Registry PR diffs against coding standards and post inline comments.

97|263|Updated Sep 23, 2023
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-registry --skill claude-review-hyperlane-xyz
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: claude-review
Source: https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-registry/tree/main/.claude/skills/claude-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-registry --skill claude-review-hyperlane-xyz

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps reviewers apply Hyperlane Registry coding standards consistently, reducing review time and catching regressions early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Standardized Review: Applies Hyperlane Registry guidelines to PR changes, ensuring consistency across reviews.
  • Early Issue Detection: Flags architectural or pattern deviations before merge, improving code quality.
  • Team Alignment: Facilitates faster onboarding by providing repeatable review criteria.

Quick Start

Review the PR diff against the Hyperlane Registry standards and post inline comments on changed lines, followed by a concise summary of issues.

Frequently Asked Questions about claude-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code reviews against project standards?

Automated code review applies documented coding standards to PR diffs, generating inline comments on violations and a summary. This standardizes feedback across reviewers and catches deviations from project patterns before merge, reducing manual review time and ensuring consistency.

Can I use code review automation for Hyperlane Registry changes?

Yes. This skill automates reviews of Hyperlane Registry changes by applying Hyperlane-specific guidelines to PR diffs, posting inline comments on changed lines and providing a concise summary of issues flagged against registry standards.

What's the best way to catch architectural regressions in code reviews?

Standardized code review flags architectural and pattern deviations early by checking PRs against established project standards before merge. This catches regressions automatically, improves code quality, and reduces issues that slip through manual review.

How can code review standards help onboard new team members?

Repeatable, documented review criteria provide consistent feedback and expectations. New reviewers learn patterns by applying the same standards across PRs, accelerating onboarding and ensuring alignment with project conventions.

Can I review code changes before committing to validate against standards?

Yes. This skill validates diffs against project patterns and generates feedback for self-review before commits, allowing developers to catch issues early and align changes with established guidelines before submission.