claude

Wrap Claude Code to review diffs, challenge edge cases, and answer repository questions.

5|Updated Apr 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestack --skill claude-timurgaleev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: claude
Source: https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestack/tree/main/skills/claude
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/timurgaleev/vibestack --skill claude-timurgaleev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Independent teams and developers often need an independent, permission-limited review of code changes and repository questions. This skill provides a Claude Code-based second opinion that can review diffs, reason about design trade-offs, and answer questions without altering the codebase.

For this, it coordinates three modes (Review, Challenge, Consult) and enforces safety boundaries to prevent unauthorized actions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Independent review: Wraps Claude Code to give a second opinion on diffs, security concerns, and design trade-offs.
  • Three modes: Review (diff review), Challenge (adversarial failure-mode review), Consult (read-only repository questions).
  • Safe, auditable workflow: Enforces strict tool boundaries, session management, and structured prompts to prevent prompt injection and ensure safe operability.

Quick Start

Trigger the Claude-based second opinion by running /claude review on your repository to start the process.

Frequently Asked Questions about claude

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get an independent second opinion on a code review without altering the repository?

An independent second opinion on a code review uses read-only file access to analyze diffs and answer repository questions. It enforces strict tool constraints and session management to ensure the codebase remains completely unaltered.

Can I use a read-only AI to challenge edge cases and find failure modes in my code?

You can challenge edge cases using an adversarial review mode that analyzes code for failure modes. It applies strict tool boundaries and structured prompts to safely identify potential issues without executing or modifying code.

What is the best way to review code diffs for security concerns and design trade-offs?

The best way to review code diffs for security concerns is using an independent review mode that reasons about design trade-offs. It operates with strict read-only permissions to safely evaluate changes without risking the codebase.

Does this code review tool protect against prompt injection when analyzing repositories?

This code review tool protects against prompt injection by implementing strict tool usage and structured prompts. It enforces safety boundaries and session management to ensure safe, auditable operability.

How do I consult on a codebase using strict tool constraints to prevent unauthorized actions?

To consult on a codebase with strict tool constraints, use a consult mode that answers repository questions using read-only file access. It prevents unauthorized actions through strict session management and structured prompts.

When do I need an independent review of code changes versus a standard review process?

You need an independent review of code changes when you require a permission-limited analysis of design trade-offs and security concerns. It provides an unbiased second opinion using read-only access to prevent unauthorized alterations.