clavix-review

Analyze code changes and generate criteria-driven review reports with severity levels.

1|Updated Jan 26, 2026

Search Tags:#architecture #security #standards #code-review #pr-review #git-diff

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/alysonhower/dupcheck --skill clavix-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: clavix-review
Source: https://github.com/alysonhower/dupcheck/tree/main/.agent/skills/clavix-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/alysonhower/dupcheck --skill clavix-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

clavix-review analyzes code changes and provides criteria-driven feedback to guide PR reviews without modifying code.

Core Features & Use Cases

Ask for PR context to establish scope and intent
Gather review criteria (security, architecture, standards, performance) and tailor the review
Collect additional context like conventions or concerns
Analyze the diff and surrounding context to inform judgement
Generate a structured review report with severity levels
Save the report to a designated location for reference

Quick Start

Provide a PR branch or diff and I will generate a structured, criteria-driven review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about clavix-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I generate a structured code review report from a git diff?▼

You can generate a structured code review report by providing a PR branch or diff, which the tool analyzes to produce criteria-driven feedback across security, architecture, standards, and performance without modifying source code.

What is criteria-driven PR review and how does it work?▼

Criteria-driven PR review analyzes code changes against tailored security, architecture, standards, and performance benchmarks to surface issues, guiding reviewers on what to assess and how to report findings.

Can I use automated code review to check architecture and security standards?▼

Yes, automated code review can check architecture and security standards by gathering tailored review criteria, analyzing the diff and surrounding context, and surfacing issues with severity levels.

Does this PR review tool modify source code during analysis?▼

No, this PR review tool does not modify source code; it strictly analyzes code changes to surface insights and saves a formatted report with severity levels to a designated location for reference.

How do I assess performance issues in a pull request?▼

You assess performance issues in a pull request by applying criteria-driven analysis to the diff and surrounding context, generating a structured report that highlights performance findings with severity levels.

What is the best way to enforce a consistent pull request review workflow?▼

The best way to enforce a consistent pull request review workflow is to generate a formatted, criteria-driven report with severity levels and a saved artifact, ensuring reviewers assess security, architecture, and standards uniformly.