skills.rest
mbed92
mbed92COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

clavix-review

Analyze git diffs against security, architecture, standards, and performance criteria.

Updated Feb 5, 2026
Search Tags:#code quality#git#developer tools#code review#pull request#security analysis
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mbed92/phd --skill clavix-review-mbed92
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: clavix-review
Source: https://github.com/mbed92/phd/tree/main/.skills/clavix-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mbed92/phd --skill clavix-review-mbed92

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of reviewing code changes by systematically analyzing them against predefined criteria, ensuring code quality, security, and adherence to standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Code Analysis: Analyzes code diffs for security, architecture, standards, and performance issues.
  • Structured Feedback: Generates detailed reports with severity levels for identified issues and positive notes.
  • Use Case: When a pull request is submitted, use this Skill to perform an initial review, flagging potential problems for human reviewers to focus on, thereby speeding up the development cycle.

Quick Start

Use the clavix-review skill to review the 'feature/new-login' branch against the main branch.

Frequently Asked Questions about clavix-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review for a pull request?▼

Automating pull request code review involves analyzing git diffs against predefined criteria for security, architecture, and performance, then generating structured reports with severity levels to provide actionable feedback.

How does criteria-driven code analysis work?▼

Criteria-driven code analysis works by gathering context from git diffs and evaluating changes against specific dimensions like security and performance, producing structured feedback with severity levels for identified issues and positive notes.

Can I analyze a feature branch against the main branch for security issues?▼

Yes, you can analyze a feature branch against the main branch for security issues by running criteria-driven code review on the git diff to flag potential security problems for human reviewers.

What is the best way to flag code quality problems before human review?▼

The best way to flag code quality problems before human review is performing automated criteria-driven analysis on code changes, systematically checking security and standards to generate structured reports with severity levels.

Does automated code review output structured reports with severity levels?▼

Yes, automated code review outputs structured reports with severity levels. It analyzes code diffs for security, architecture, standards, and performance issues, directing the generated findings to a specified directory.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
yellow-seedyellow-seed

code-review

Identify and summarize differences between the current Git branch and its remote base branch.

Community
Basic
gsarmaonlinegsarmaonline

review-comments

Analyze pull request review comments and resolve failing GitHub Actions checks.

Community
Advanced
io-wyio-wy

code-reviewer

Analyze code diffs and files for bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells.

Community
Advanced
jakerbrownjakerbrown
1

review-r

Review R scripts for issues and coding standards, generating markdown reports.

Community
Intermediate