What problem does it solve? AI-assisted coding pipelines leave behind telltale artifacts in source code: tool watermarks like "Generated with Claude Code", pipeline phase markers, planning comments, WHAT-not-WHY restatements, and half-implemented stubs. These leak provenance, look unprofessional in code review, and clutter the codebase before a PR is opened. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Five-category artifact detection: Scans for AI signatures and watermarks, pipeline phase markers, planning/generation comments, WHAT-not-WHY comments, and dead code or stub functions using a regex catalog refreshed by live web research. - Approval-gated parallel cleanup: Presents a full detection report for human approval, then dispatches parallel cleaner agents in waves with per-instance judgment for borderline comments. - Verification loop with linter integration: Re-scans after cleanup, runs the project linter (ruff, eslint, go vet, clippy), and loops up to 3 iterations before escalating residuals. - Use Case: Before opening a PR after an AI-driven build pipeline, run the cleanup on the working tree to strip phase markers, AI footers, and leftover TODO stubs so reviewers see only intentional code. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to clean AI-generation leftovers from the current working tree, optionally scoping to a branch or a specific path glob.