client-validation-document

Generate a Part 5 Client Validation Document with ACCEPT/REJECT/EDIT/DEFER decisions.

Updated May 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ajayatwal1105-emerson/digital-marketing-pro --skill client-validation-document
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: client-validation-document
Source: https://github.com/ajayatwal1105-emerson/digital-marketing-pro/tree/main/skills/client-validation-document
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ajayatwal1105-emerson/digital-marketing-pro --skill client-validation-document

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It produces the Part 5 Client Validation Document that lets clients make authoritative ACCEPT/REJECT/EDIT/DEFER decisions on the most strategically consequential v1 findings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-backed finding review: Presents each finding with cited sources, a clear implication if accepted, and a structured decision mechanism.
  • Decision-ready response format: Includes an answer framework (typically a paired JSON response file/template) so responses can be mapped into Part 6 decision-matrix triggers.
  • Guardrailed workflow gating: Refuses to run unless Parts 2–4 are complete and the engagement state reflects required completion, ensuring “one true stop” integrity.

Quick Start

Run /digital-marketing-pro:client-validation-document after Parts 2, 3, and 4 are completed to generate the Part 5 client validation document and its response template.

Frequently Asked Questions about client-validation-document

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I turn research findings into client validation decisions for a marketing strategy?

A client validation document compiles strategically consequential v1 research findings into client-ready ACCEPT, REJECT, EDIT, and DEFER decisions. It presents each finding with cited sources, clear implications, and a structured response template for formal marketing engagement validation.

What is the best way to structure a decision matrix response for marketing engagement findings?

The best way to structure a decision matrix response is using a paired JSON response template that maps client answers into downstream decision-matrix triggers. This evidence-backed format pairs each finding with cited sources and clear implications for systematic processing.

Do I need to complete earlier engagement phases before generating a client validation document?

Yes, you must complete Parts 2, 3, and 4 before generating the Part 5 client validation document. The workflow gating refuses to run unless the engagement state reflects the required completion of these earlier phases to ensure research integrity.

How do I generate the Part 5 client validation document after finishing v1 research?

To generate the Part 5 client validation document after v1 research, verify Parts 2 through 4 are complete, then run the client validation document command. The system extracts evidence-backed findings, writes the document and response template to the engagement's part-05 folder, and marks Part 5 as awaiting input.

Why does the client validation workflow require evidence sourcing for each finding?

The client validation workflow requires evidence sourcing to ensure unbiased research is formally validated before proceeding. Each finding cites its sources and outlines clear implications if accepted, enabling clients to make authoritative, evidence-backed ACCEPT, REJECT, EDIT, or DEFER decisions.

When should I not use a structured response template for client validation?

You should not use a structured response template when earlier engagement phases are incomplete or when the marketing research lacks evidence-backed findings. The workflow gating prevents execution unless Parts 2 through 4 are finished and the engagement state validates required completion.