clp

Refine artifacts through a triadic self-check loop before publishing.

8|Updated Feb 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/usurobor/cnos --skill clp
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: clp
Source: https://github.com/usurobor/cnos/tree/main/src/packages/cnos.core/skills/agent/clp
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/usurobor/cnos --skill clp

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CLP provides a disciplined workflow to refine artifacts toward coherence before publication, reducing the risk of silent failures and misinterpretations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Triadic self-check loop that evaluates PATTERN, RELATION, and EXIT on each version.
  • Versioning discipline with changelog guidance to publish only the latest coherent version.
  • Applies to design docs, skills, specs, contracts, and essays requiring structured revision and accountability.

Quick Start

Start a CLP cycle by seed-versioning your artifact, reflect on tensions, and patch the weakest axis toward publish-ready coherence.

Frequently Asked Questions about clp

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I refine a design doc or spec toward coherence before publishing?

You refine an artifact toward coherence before publishing by applying a triadic self-check loop that evaluates pattern, relation, and exit axes. This structured revision process enforces patch-based improvements and maintains a changelog to ensure only the latest coherent version is published.

What is a triadic self-check loop for artifact versioning?

A triadic self-check loop for artifact versioning evaluates pattern, relation, and exit dimensions on each version iteration. It reduces the risk of silent failures and misinterpretations by enforcing explicit coherence checks before publishing design docs, skills, specs, contracts, or essays.

How do I start a coherence-first refinement cycle for a contract or essay?

You start a coherence-first refinement cycle by seed-versioning your artifact, reflecting on tensions within the content, and patching the weakest axis. This disciplined workflow guides the artifact through structured revisions toward publish-ready coherence.

Does this artifact refinement workflow support changelog maintenance and patch-based improvements?

Yes, this artifact refinement workflow enforces patch-based improvements and provides versioning discipline with changelog guidance. It maintains accountability across structured revisions and ensures only the latest coherent version of your spec or design doc is published.

When should I use a structured coherence check process for versioning artifacts?

You should use a structured coherence check process when refining design docs, skills, specs, contracts, or essays that require versioned refinement and accountability. It is necessary when silent failures and misinterpretations during publication pose a risk to artifact integrity.

What are the limitations of relying on ad hoc revision instead of a coherence-first refinement workflow?

Relying on ad hoc revision instead of a coherence-first refinement workflow increases the risk of silent failures and misinterpretations in published artifacts. Without a triadic self-check loop, you lack explicit accountability and may publish versions that have not been validated for structural coherence.