code-audit

Name: code-audit
Availability: InStock
Author: theycallmeholla

Audit software repositories for security, quality, and architectural risks.

Updated Jul 23, 2026

Search Tags:#architecture #security #refactoring #code-review #code-audit #technical-debt

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Theycallmeholla/skills --skill code-audit-theycallmeholla

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-audit
Source: https://github.com/Theycallmeholla/skills/tree/main/skills/code-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Theycallmeholla/skills --skill code-audit-theycallmeholla

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill solves the problem of ad-hoc, inconsistent code reviews by providing a structured, repeatable methodology to identify security vulnerabilities, quality smells, and architectural flaws in any repository.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured Audit Workflow: Executes a multi-phase assessment covering security, quality, performance, dependencies, and architecture.
Evidence-Based Reporting: Generates a prioritized findings report that cites specific file locations and line numbers for every issue.
Use Case: Use this when inheriting a legacy codebase, performing technical due diligence before an acquisition, or conducting a periodic health check on a production project to ensure long-term maintainability.

Quick Start

Run the code-audit skill on the current repository to generate a prioritized health report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I audit a legacy codebase for security vulnerabilities and technical debt?▼

A codebase health audit identifies security vulnerabilities, code quality issues, and architectural risks through a structured, multi-phase assessment. It provides evidence-based reporting with prioritized findings and specific file locations for technical due diligence and triage.

How do I perform technical due diligence on a software repository before an acquisition?▼

Performing technical due diligence requires a comprehensive, multi-phase audit of the software repository to identify security vulnerabilities, architectural risks, and technical debt. This generates an evidence-based report citing specific file locations and line numbers for every issue.

Do I need a specific shell environment to run a repository health check?▼

Yes, a bash-compatible shell environment with access to standard repository analysis tools is required for inventory and dependency checking. This environment executes the multi-phase assessment workflow to generate the prioritized findings report.

What is the best way to identify architectural flaws and code quality smells?▼

The best way to identify architectural flaws and code quality smells is a structured audit workflow assessing security, quality, performance, dependencies, and architecture. This evidence-based approach yields a prioritized findings report citing specific file locations.

How does evidence-based code review improve software maintainability?▼

Evidence-based code review improves maintainability by generating a prioritized findings report citing specific file locations and line numbers for every issue. This systematic methodology ensures long-term project health by replacing inconsistent ad-hoc reviews.