code-quality-review

Audit Tastik codebases for maintainability and architectural issues with prioritized reports.

Updated Feb 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/FabioFiorita/tastik --skill code-quality-review-fabiofiorita
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: code-quality-review
Source: https://github.com/FabioFiorita/tastik/tree/main/.agents/skills/code-quality-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/FabioFiorita/tastik --skill code-quality-review-fabiofiorita

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides systematic, tech-lead level audits of a codebase to identify maintainability, architectural, and quality gaps, enabling reliable long-term evolution.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured audit framework covering architecture, SOLID adherence, DRY principles, testability, and conventions.
  • Repeatable process that guides exploration, classification, prioritization, fixes, and verification.
  • Actionable guidance for single-file, component, or full-project sweeps with clear severity tags and remediation steps.
  • Use cases include refactor planning, onboarding new contributors, enforcing coding standards, and improving test coverage.

Quick Start

Ask me to run a code-quality review on a specific file, folder, or feature to generate a prioritized, actionable report.

Frequently Asked Questions about code-quality-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a code quality audit to identify architecture and maintainability issues?

A code quality review identifies maintainability and architectural issues by systematically evaluating SOLID adherence, DRY principles, and testability. It produces a prioritized, actionable report with severity tags and clear remediation steps for long-term evolution.

Can I use this to plan a refactoring task for frontend components and backend functions?

Yes, you can use this code quality review to plan refactoring tasks for frontend components, hooks, and backend Convex functions. The audit applies framework best practices to generate severity-guided fixes and actionable guidance for your codebase.

What is the best way to enforce SOLID and DRY principles during a codebase sweep?

The best way to enforce SOLID and DRY principles is through a structured audit framework that guides exploration, classification, and prioritization. This process applies framework best practices to deliver a prioritized report with clear severity tags and remediation steps.

Does this code quality review work for onboarding new contributors and improving test coverage?

Yes, this code quality review works for onboarding new contributors and improving test coverage. It provides a repeatable process and actionable guidance that enforces coding standards and highlights testability gaps across single-file or full-project sweeps.

When should I not use a tech-lead level code quality audit for my project?

You should avoid a tech-lead level code quality audit if you need a quick syntax check rather than a systematic maintainability and architecture evaluation. The process is designed for structured refactor planning and enforcing standards, not surface-level linting.